Monday, April 30, 2012

The Name of the Game

We know that the modern western, heterosexual concept of "Sexual Orientation" is only good for isolating those men who want to openly and "blatantly" seek intimacy with other men. We also know that there never was any such concept in the world.


Societies give names to those human relationships that it wants to give importance to. E.g. the Indian society has elaborate names for a lot of blood relatives and in-laws, including separate names for maternal and paternal in-laws, maternal and paternal uncles and aunts and so on, because for the Indian society these relationships are very important and need to be recognized so that they fit into the kind of society Indian culture seeks.

Indian culture has just a broad name "dost" or friend for male friends, because the formal society doesn't want to promote or recognize such bonds. But since men's spaces have carried on their male friendships, and inspite of non-recognition by the society they continue to play an important part in men's lives, the word is still in use. Although, a male friend has no social or legal right or claim over his friend, and no social obligation or duties. Whatever there is between two male friends is just mutual, based on mutual trust.

Indian society has no name for love bonds or sexual intimacy between two masculine males (men), because it wants to portray that such intimacy is not even possible and doesn't exist at all, so that it may seem weird to men themselves to harbour such feelings (although everyone does, but they're also conditioned to feel ashamed for it!). Since, men did not have such bonds openly, they did not give even an informal name to it (although, they have given a name to sexual play between men called "masti"). However, men continued sexual and emotional intimacy with men behind the label of "friendships" which even provided them with safety against being barred socially from manhood.

But, the ancient Greek societies, and there are still such sociesties that exist in the most unlikely places -- and they're all macho, warrior societies -- placed great importance on romantic bonds between (straight) men. Therefore, they had special names for such relationships -- name for one's male lover ... since these bonds were constituted around age, there were separate names for the older and the younger lovers.

However, in none of these societies, were there names that differentiated between men who liked men and men who liked women. None of these names held a man who liked man as a different 'gender' of man, like the term 'homosexualit y' or 'homosexuality' suggests. The idea that males who like women and men are essentially and biologically different from each other form a different gender is purely a Western one, totally invalid and the most harmful part of the larger conspiracy against men.

However, even if the anti-man Forces of Heterosexualization were to implement this differentiation fairly, it would work against their very own interests. Because, then 90% of men will become homosexuals and it would sound strange to call the remaining heterosexuals as 'straight'. Because straight means 'normal', 'regular' and 'masculine'. Then Heterosexual would be the gays and be classified along with the Third Gender.

That would be the natural scheme of things.

However, the Forces of Heterosexualization are able to use this system of isolation against male-to-male intimacy only because the society has strong pscyho-sexual mechanisms and hostilities in place against man to man intimacy, which operate at the deepest level of man's existence, and which the forces of heterosexualization keep thrusting on men, perpetually.

It's due to these pressures continually applied on men that men are kept from choosing the 'homosexual' label, when this system of sexual apartheid is used, and which gives the heterosexual society and its men the present shape, which shows men as primarily, constantly and exclusively heterosexual, and the third gender minority as 'homosexual'.

From http://notes-on-men-and-manhood.blogspot.com/

Heterosexualization of men and their spaces

Heterosexualization of a society or of social spaces refers to a process whereby the gender-based spaces in traditional non-Westernised (and pre-modern western societies in the past) -- which are divided into men's spaces, women's spaces and third gender spaces -- are abolished as part of Westernization of the society and replaced with heterosexual, mixed-sex spaces. It further involves segregating the society, especially the men's spaces, on the basis of sexual orientation.




In other words, heterosexualization of a society involves changing the character of a society from 'gender segregation' to 'sexual orientation segregation'.

In a traditional society divided on the basis of gender orientation, there are usually three genders/ identities/ spaces: Men, women and third gender (the last consisting of people who are considered both males and females, including hermaphrodites, intersexuals and feminine gendered males -- transgendered, cross-dressers, transvestites and transsexuals of whatever sexuality).

In a heterosexualized society, these spaces are converted into : Heterosexual mixed sex space (formerly men's spaces), Heterosexual women space and LGBT (previously third gender).

Heterosexualization of a society also involves heterosexualizing the customs, traditions, rituals, values, mores, attitudes, beliefs, history, mythology, laws, science and other social institutions and cultural elements of a society.

Heterosexualization of individuals refers to a process whereby humans, particularly men, are conditioned to be exclusively heterosexual, often by suppressing or blocking their sexual need for men, and diverting this need towards women through various psycho-social mechanisms.

HETEROSEXUALIZATION OF MEN'S SPACES

Heterosexualization is an oppressive, particularly anti-man process which was invented in the modern west, which seeks to destroy the natural and traditional way of human living, i.e., in separate male, female and third sex spaces. The primary target of this process are the men's spaces which are converted into mixed sex spaces for both men and women.

The heterosexualisation of men's spaces are accompanied by making the pressure on men to prove their sexual interest in women to the extreme -- so much so that it takes the form of a sexual identity -- called Heterosexuality. Western Heterosexual spaces maintain that the overwhelming majority of men have an exclusive, constant and all-pervading sexual interest in women, which guides all their actions and attitudes, and that they are all capable and willing of emotional and social bonds with women. Heterosexualisation is also accompanied by an extreme pressure on men to suppress their sexual need for men, or else be isolated out of the men's spaces (which are now completely heterosexualised).

In other words, heterosexualisation of social spaces also involves the 'homosexualisation of male-male sexual and even social bonds'. Through this process, using the Western concept of 'sexual orientation', men who own up their sexual need for men are isolated into the modern version of the third sex, the 'homosexual'. The Third sex space, including the 'gay' space has traditionally been extremely stigmatised for men, and this means that the the majority of men who earlier indulged in sexual and romantic activities with other men, albeit behind a social screen, are now forced to completely disown their sexual need for men, which the heterosexual society then propagates as a quality that belongs to 'feminised' males, known as 'homosexuals'.

The heterosexual spaces, where the forces of heterosexualisation are extremely powerful and in complete control of the men's spaces, propagate such values, where male-female sexual need is the most important human quality upon which the entire mainstream social structure and mores are based. The male-female sex and romantic bonds have the supreme right and position in the social hierarchy, before which the traditional bonds are given a secondary place. Thus the male-female sexual bond has the supreme right over all other bonds -- be it the mother-adult son relationship, two brothers or a brother-sister bond.

Especially targeted for persecution in heterosexual spaces are bonds between men, and not only sexual bonds but even friendships. Heterosexual spaces do not give this most cherished of male relationships any space or dignity at all, and of course no recognition or rights. Any social or emotional intimacy between two males is promptly labelled as 'gay', keeping in mind the extreme fear that men have of this word. E.g. in the US, two men cannot hold hands in public without being jeered as 'gay'. Two male friends cannot sit on the same seat on an empty bus, nor can they go for a movie without a girl with them. Of course, these spaces have generated so much hostility against male intimacy that they would never think of dancing together with another man, which comes easily to a man who has grown up in a non-western traditional space.

The media, which is heavily in control of the forces of heterosexualisation are one of the main instruments of control and propaganda for these forces. They propagate such male behaviour as men "puking at the thought of being kissed by another male", which are not natural male behaviours, and not found in men who live in traditional men's spaces. A lot of ruckus was created by these hostile forces upon a kissing scene between two men in the movie Alexander.

In fact, anything that the forces of heterosexualisation do not want men to indulge in is propagated as 'gay' by these forces. And it works every time.

The heterosexualised spaces are very sensitive to the needs and dignity of women but quite hostile to the needs and privacy of men.

Heterosexualization of Men

Heterosexualization of men is a process whereby, social mechanisms that work at the macro and social level as well as psycho-social mechanisms that work inside men psychologically, are exerted on men to supress their sexual need for men and to and divert this sexual need towards women, in order to make them heterosexual. The outer and inner social mechanisms created to do this include:

(1) social stigma around male-male sexuality that considers it inappropriate and immoral,

(2) Religious condemnation by Judeo/Islamic/Christian religions.

(3) the concept of Sexual orientation, through which men who show outer signs of intimacy with other men are identified, labelled and then isolated away from the men's mainstream spaces, into third sex ghettos known as 'homosexual'.

(4) Peer-Pressure

(5) Race for Manhood
(6) Ridiculing, and verbally, emotionally or physically abusing sexuality between men.

(7) Making fun of male-male sexual feelings, and especially portraying it as feminine (third sex) on the media.

The forces of heterosexualisation keep on refurbishing these mechanisms and keep adding to the pressures on men in heterosexual spaces, because, if they relent, men may easily retrieve their sexual need for men, and their exclusive heterosexuality may be lost.

Although, the Western, Heterosexual spaces claim to be open, just and fair, it is considered absolultely valid to create, maintain and impose these pressures on men to make them heterosexual, including the sexual exploitation of men, if it teaches them to open up to women, sexually, socially and emotionally.
Men succeed in heterosexualising themselves to various degrees, the rest they make up by pretences and wearing masks of heterosexuality.

Additional Reading:

http://heterosexualisationofsociety.blogspot.com/

http://heterosexualisationofsociety.blogspot.com/

http://heterosexualisation-experiences.blogspot.com/

http://case-studies-on-heterosexualisati.blogspot.com/

http://heterosexualisation-news.blogspot.com/

http://notes-on-heterosexualisation.blogspot.com/

http://strategy-of-heterosexualisation-force.blogspot.com/

http://notes-on-men-and-manhood.blogspot.com/search/label/Forces%20of%20Heterosexualization

http://notes-on-men-and-manhood.blogspot.com/search/label/Heterosexualization
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...